Keyword

Value, quality, risk, price, private label, breakfast cereal, South Africa

Abstract

Private label brands, consisting of merchandise sold exclusively through a particular retail chain, are growing in prominence throughout the world. Although highly advantageous to retailers, these brands exhibit pitifully low penetration rates in South Africa and are typically seen as being inferior to national/manufacturer brands. This study considers three key demographic variables and the impact of these on consumer responses pertaining to the perceptions of a private label brand. In this respect, a range of responses to PLB characteristics are assessed, focusing on perceived quality, risk, relative price and value. Furthermore, antecedents affecting perceived quality, and a moderator variable assessing the impact of entrenched loyalty to national brands, are included in the mix. Lastly, willingness to buy is also probed. The findings reveal that high income households shun PLBs, as do younger adults of 21 to 40 years of age. In contrast, consumers aged 60 and above appear to embrace these brands. There was a negligible difference recorded by the gender divide, although females appeared more inclined to favour private label merchandise. These results may assist retailers in better targeting predisposed consumers, particularly through customisable channels such as Facebook and Google Mail advertisements.


Full Text : PDF

References
  1. Ailawadi, K., Pauwels, K. and Steenkamp, J. 2008. Private label use and store loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 19-30.
  2. Alfansi, L. and Sargeant, A. 2000. Market segmentation in the Indonesian banking sector: the relationship between demographics and desired customer benefits. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(2), 64–74.
  3. Bao, Y., Bao, Y. and Sheng, S. 2011a. Motivating Purchase of Private Brands: Effects of Store Image, Product Signatureness, and Quality Variation. Journal of Business Research, 64
  4. Beane, T. and Ennis, D. 1987. Market segmentation: A review. European Journal of Marketing, 21(5), 20-42.
  5. Beneke, J. 2013. A closer inspection of the impact of perceived risk on purchase intention of premium private label brands: The effect of age, gender, income and racial group. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 7(2), 44-56.
  6. Beneke, J. 2010. Consumer perceptions of private label brands within the retail grocery sector of South Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 203-220.
  7. Beneke, J., Flynn, R., Greig, T. and Mukaiwa, M. 2013. The influence of perceived product quality, relative price and risk on customer value and willingness to buy: A study of private label merchandise. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 22(3), 218-228.
  8. Bloch, P., Brunel, F. and Arnold, T. 2003. Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(March)
  9. Bureau of Market Research. 2013. Household Income and Expenditure Patterns. Available: http://www.unisa.ac.za/news/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Household-income-and-expenditure-patterns-Press-Release-3Jan2012.pdf. Dated 04/11/2012.
  10. Chowdhury, J., Reardon, J. and Srivastava, R. 1998. Alternative modes of measuring store image: An empirical assessment of structured versus unstructured measures. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(2), 72–86.
  11. Dodds, W., Monroe, K. and Grewal, D. 1991. Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
  12. Euromonitor, 2013. Country Report: Breakfast Cereals in South Africa. Available http://www.euromonitor.com/breakfast-cereals-in-south-africa/report. Dated 01/04/2014.
  13. Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E. and Schreier, M. 2010.The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers’ product demand. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 65-79.
  14. Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J. and Borin, N. 1998a. The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers' evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 331-352.
  15. Kotler, P. and Keller, K. 2011. Marketing Management, 14th edition. Pearson, New Jersey.
  16. Kumar, N. and Steenkamp, J. 2007. Private Label Strategy: How to meet the store brand challenge. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.
  17. Kwon, K., Lee, M. and Kwon, Y. 2008.The effect of perceived product characteristics on private brand purchase. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(2), 105-114.
  18. Kwun, J. and Oh, H. 2008. Effects of brand, price, and risk on customers’ value perceptions and behavioral intentions in the restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing, 11(1), 31-49.
  19. Laroche, M., Saad, G., Cleveland, M. and Browne, E. 2000. Gender differences in information search strategies for a Christmas gift. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(6), 500–522.
  20. Levy, S. and Gendel-Guterman, H. 2012. Does advertising matter to store brand purchase intention? A conceptual framework. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 21(2), 89-97.
  21. Lin, C. 2002. Segmenting customer brand preference: Demographic or psychographic. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 11(4), 249–268.
  22. Moreau, C., Bonney, L. and Herd, K. 2011. It’s the thought (and the effort) that counts: How customizing for others differs from customizing for oneself. Journal of Marketing, 75(5)
  23. Pallant, J. 2013. SPSS Survival Manual, 5th edition. Open University Press, London.
  24. Pham, M. and Avnet, T. 2004. Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(March), 503-518.
  25. Reardon, J., Miller, C. and Coe, B. 2011. Applied scale development: Measurement of store image. Journal of Applied Business Research, 11(4), 85-93.
  26. Ricciuto, L. Tarasuk, V. and Yatchew. A. 2006. Socio-demographic influences on food purchasing among Canadian households. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60, 778–790.
  27. Richardson, P., Dick, A. and Jain, A. 1994. Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 28-36.
  28. Sánchez-Fernández, R. and Iniesta-Bonillo, M. 2007. The concept of perceived value: A systematic review of the research. Marketing Theory, 7(4), 427-451.
  29. Semeijn, J., van Riel, A. and Ambrosini, A. 2004. Consumer evaluations of store brands: Effects of store image and product attributes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(4), 247-258.
  30. Sethuraman, R. and Cole, C. 1999. Pricing strategy & practice: Factors influencing the price premiums that consumers pay for national brands over store brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 8(4), 340-351.
  31. Shiu, E. and Dawson, J. 2001. Demographic segmentation of shoppers at traditional markets and supermarkets in Taiwan. Journal of Segmentation in Marketing, 4(2), 69-85.
  32. Slama, M. and Tashchian, A. 1985. Selected socioeconomic and demographic characteristics associated with purchasing involvement. Journal of Marketing, 49, 72-82.
  33. Snoj, B., Korda, A. and Mumel, D. 2004. The relationships among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product value. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(3), 156-167.
  34. Sorce, P., Perotti, V. and Widrick, S. 2005.Attitude and age differences in online buying. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 33(2), 122-132.
  35. Stafford, M. 1996. Demographic discriminators of service quality in the banking industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 10(4), 6–22.
  36. Statistics SA. 2013. Mid-year population estimates. Available:
  37.      http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022013.pdf. Accessed 02/09/2013.
  38. Sweeney, J. and Soutar, G. 2001. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
  39. Sweeney, J., Soutar, G. and Johnson, L. 1999. The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 77-105.
  40. Visagie, J. 2013. Who are the middle class in South Africa? Does it matter for policy? Available: http://www.econ3x3.org/article/who-are-middle-class-south-africa-does-it-matter-policy. Dated 29/04/2013.
  41. Wedel, M. and Kamakura, W. 2000. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations, 2nd edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts.
  42. Wu, P., Yeh, G. and Hsiao, C. 2011. The effect of store image and service quality on brand image and purchase intention for private label brands. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19(1), 30-39.
  43. Yoo, B., Donthu, N. and Lee, S. 2000. An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 195-211.
  44. Zhou, L., Yang, Z. and Hui, M. 2010.Non-Local or local brands? A multi-level investigation into confidence in brand origin identification and its strategic implications. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 202-218.