<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article_metadata generated_at="2026-10-02T04:55:11+00:00">
  <journal>
    <title>Journal of Business and Retail Management Research</title>
    <acronym>JBRMR</acronym>
    <issn_print></issn_print>
    <issn_online>2056-6271</issn_online>
    <doi_prefix>https://doi.org/10.24052/JBRMR/</doi_prefix>
  </journal>
  <article>
    <id>20</id>
    <title>Consumer Perception at Point of Purchase: Evaluating Proposed Package Designs in an Eye-tracking Lab</title>
    <abstract>In today’s retail environment, consumer products are increasingly competing for customer’s attention. Research has shown that 60-80% of purchasing decisions are influenced in-store. Thus, packaging that stands out from competitors gains a competitive advantage. This study investigates the use of eye-tracking as a method to evaluate and design packaging with better Point-of-Purchase qualities. An eye-tracking laboratory was used and shoppers were recruited for three rounds of experiments. In total, 128 participants were recruited in order to assess the potential of eye-tracking. Results show that, when taking some methodological constraints into account, eye-tracking complements traditional methodologies with further insights when investigating the Point-of-Purchase qualities of packaging.</abstract>
    <doi></doi>
    <url>https://jbrmr.com/details&amp;cid=20</url>
    <pdf_url>https://jbrmr.com/cdn/article_file/i-4_c-20.pdf</pdf_url>
    <volume>Volume 05</volume>
    <issue>Issue 1</issue>
    <issue_id>4</issue_id>
    <issue_published_month>2010-10-01</issue_published_month>
    <published_date>2012-02-24</published_date>
    <online_first_status>no</online_first_status>
    <online_first_date></online_first_date>
    <history>
      <received></received>
      <revised></revised>
      <accepted></accepted>
    </history>
    <keywords>
      <keyword>Eye-tracking</keyword>
      <keyword>point-of-purchase marketing</keyword>
      <keyword>FMCG</keyword>
      <keyword>Package design</keyword>
    </keywords>
    <declarations>
      <funding></funding>
      <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
      <data_availability></data_availability>
      <author_contributions></author_contributions>
    </declarations>
    <publication_notice>
      <type>none</type>
      <text></text>
    </publication_notice>
    <metrics>
      <views>581152</views>
      <downloads>67</downloads>
      <citations>0</citations>
    </metrics>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Erik Wastlund</name>
        <organization>CTF-Service research center, Karlstad University</organization>
        <country></country>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Poja Shams</name>
        <organization>CTF-Service research center, Karlstad University</organization>
        <country></country>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Martin Lofgren</name>
        <organization>CTF-Service research center, Karlstad University</organization>
        <country></country>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lars Witell</name>
        <organization>CTF-Service research center, Karlstad University</organization>
        <country></country>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Anders Gustafsson</name>
        <organization>CTF-Service research center, Karlstad University</organization>
        <country></country>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <supplementary_materials/>
  </article>
</article_metadata>
