Country personality, Brand personality, Marketing, South Korea, Thailand


Brand personality applies human personality traits to describe a brand. While brand personality has attracted interests from marketing researchers for decades, the application of brand personality to describe a country as a person is still in its infancy. To fill in this void, the present study employs a qualitative research to gain insights in this topic and explore the possibility that new country personality dimensions and/or traits will emerge. Data collected from Thai consumers reveal six dimensions of Korea’s country personality including Development (e.g., advanced, developed, highly educated), Agreeableness (e.g., friendly, sincere, sympathetic), Good Appearance (e.g., cute, beautiful, surgical, handsome), Trendiness (e.g., entertaining, fashionable, touristic),Conservatism(e.g., religious, orderly, patriotic), and Negativity(selfish, impolite, chaotic).Several research implications are discussed and avenues for future research are offered.

Full Text : PDF

  1. Aaker, J.L., 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356.
  2. Bouhlel, O.,  Mzoughi, N., Hadiji, D., and Slimane, I.B., 2011.  Brand personality’s influence on     the purchase intention: a mobile marketing case.  International Journal of Business and     Management, 6(9), 210-227.
  3. Chen, Q. and Rodgers, S., 2006.Development of an instrument to measure web site 
  4. personality. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(1), 47-64.
  5. d’Astous, A. and Boujbel, L., 2007.Positioning countries on personality dimensions: scale     development and implications for country marketing. Journal of Business Research, 60(3),     231-239.
  6. d'Astous, A., François,C., and d'Astous, E., 2006.  The personality of cultural festivals: scale development and applications. International Journal of Arts Management, 8(2), 14-23.
  7. Hosany, S., Ekinci, Y., andUysal, M., 2006.Destination image and destination personality: an     application of branding theories to tourism places. Journal of Business Research, 59, 638–
  8.     642.
  9. Kim, Y., 2006.  Do South Korean companies need to obscure their country-of-origin image? A     case of Samsung. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(2), 126-137.
  10. Lee, C.Y., 2012.  Korean culture and its influence on business practice in South Korea.  The     Journal of International Management Studies, 7(2), 184-191. 
  11. Sirisoontorn, S., and Polyorat, K., 2013.Impact of country personality and country image on     country of origin and purchase intentions for global supply chain management     presented at the 2nd International Conference on Production and Supply Chain Management     (ICPSCM 2013), Rome, Italy. 
  12. Sung, Y. and Tinkham, S. F., 2005.Brand personality structures in the United States and Korea: common and culture-specific factors.  Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 334–350.
  13. Swaminathan, V., Stilley K. M. and Ahluwalia, R., 2009.When brand personality matters: the moderating role of attachment styles. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 985-1002.
  14. Tsiotsou, R., 2012. Developing a scale for measuring the personality of sport teams. Journal of Services Marketing, 248-249.
  15. Venable, B., Rose, G., Bush, V. and Gilbert, F., 2005.  The role of brand personality in charitable giving: an assessment and validation. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 33(3), 295–316.
  16. Upadhyaya, M., 2012. Influence of destination image and destination personality: an empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing & Communication, 7(3), 40-47.
  17. Yu, S., 1999.  The growth pattern of Samsung electronics: a strategy perspective.  International     Studies of Management & Organization, 28(4), 57-72.