International Trade, Exports, Gravity Model, H-O Theory, Linder’s Theory, Pooled OLS


This paper analyzes the export destinations of Malaysia and top six trading partners (an average from 1995 (2012) using gravity model and pooled ordinary least square (OLS) analysis. As suggested by the pioneer of gravity model (Tinbergen, 1962), the vibrancy of trading activities depend on the resemblance of exporting and importing countries which in parallel with Staffan Linder theory of trade(1961). These include similarities such as GDP per capita, international language, and border sharing and taste in product consumed (Morales, Sheu and Zahler, 2014).The theory also highlights that the distance between the two trading countries have significant effect on trading activities. However, the empirical study in the case of Malaysia proven opposite effect thus allowing Heckscher-Ohlin theory to be highlighted in contrast to Linder theory as H-O theory suggests that a particular country will trade with another country with dissimilar economic performance level. The general finding of this study suggest that Malaysia is more towards Linder theory based on the coefficient sign of GDP per capita differential.

Full Text : PDF

  1. Abidin, I. S. Z., Jantan, M. D., Satar, N. M., &Haseeb, M. (2014). Trade Linkages between Malaysia and the OIC Member Countries: Empirical Evidence Based on Gravity Model. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(11), 1938.
  2. Agosin, M. R., Alvarez, R., & Bravo‐Ortega, C. (2012). Determinants of export diversification around the world: 1962–2000. The World Economy, 35(3), 295-315.
  3. Batra, A. (2006). India's global trade potential: The gravity model approach.Global Economic Review, 35(3), 327-361.
  4. Bergstrand, J.H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67: 474-81. Harvard University Press.
  5. Bergstrand J.H. (1989). The generalised gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor proportion theory in international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics: 143-53.
  6. Bidlingmaier, T. (2007, June).International trade and economic growth in developing countries.In presentation at the DEGIT XII conference in Melbourne in June.
  7. Breusch T, Pagan A. The LM test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Econometric Studies 1980; 47: 239-254
  8. Carneiro, J., Rocha, A. D., & Silva, J. F. D. (2011). Determinants of export performance: a study of large Brazilian manufacturing firms. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 8(2), 107-132.
  9. Carrère, C., Grujovic, A., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2015). Trade and frictional unemployment in the global economy (No. 10692).CEPR Discussion Papers.
  10. Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1983). Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika, 70(1), 1-10.
  11. Frankel, J. A., Stein, E., & Wei, S. J. (1997). Regional trading blocs in the world economic system. Peterson Institute.
  12. Jarreau, J., &Poncet, S. (2012). Export sophistication and economic growth: Evidence from China. Journal of development Economics, 97(2), 281-292.
  13. Jongwanich, J. (2010). Determinants of export performance in East and Southeast Asia. The World Economy, 33(1), 20-41.
  14. Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows (Vol. 234). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  15. Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., Vining, G. G. (2001). Introduction to linear regression analysis, 3rd edition, Wiley, New York.
  16. Morales, E., Sheu, G., & Zahler, A. (2014). Gravity and extended gravity: Using moment inequalities to estimate a model of export entry (No. w19916). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  17. Odell, P. L. (1983). Gauss–Markov theorem. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences.
  18. Porojan, A. (2001). Trade flows and spatial effects: the gravity model revisited. Open economies review, 12(3), 265-280.
  19. Rahman, M. M. (2003). A panel data analysis of Bangladesh’s trade: the gravity model approach. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of the European Trade Study Group (ETSG2003). European Trade Study Group.
  20. Rahman, M. M. (2009). Australia's global trade potential: evidence from the gravity model analysis. In Proceedings of the 2009 Oxford Business and Economics Conference (OBEC 2009) (pp. 1-41).Oxford University Press.
  21. Ravishankar, G., & Stack, M. M. (2014). The Gravity Model and Trade Efficiency: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Eastern European Countries' Potential Trade. The World Economy, 37(5), 690-704.
  22. Sun, P., &Heshmati, A. (2010).International trade and its effects on economic growth in China.
  23. Trang, P. T., &Hieu, T. H. (2011).Effects of Population Growth on Economic Growth in Asian Developing Countries. Bachelor Project in Economics, Malardalen University.
  24. Wang, C., Wei, Y., & Liu, X. (2010). Determinants of bilateral trade flows in OECD countries: evidence from gravity panel data models. The World Economy, 33(7), 894-915.
  25. Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  26. Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72, pp. 57- 89.
  27. Yusoff, M. (2005).Malaysian bilateral trade relations and economic growth. International Journal of Business and Society, 6(2), 55-68.