Corporate Governance, Board of Director, Board Independent, Board Diversity, Firm Performance, Professional Knowledge and Experience


This paper reviews a recent literature with regard to the relationship between board composition and performance of listed firms in Nigeria. To achieve the objective of the study, reviews of some prior empirical research on corporate governance, performance, and the theories were examined. The recent studies reveal that inconsistent findings were still found in the previous studies on the characteristics of corporate governance literature. Therefore, the need to measure the link between the board independent and performance will for a long time continue to remain an interesting study area. This paper, therefore, recommends that the researchers should try and avoid the mistake of the prior studies by over-reliance on the direct relationship between board independent and firm performance. The study also recommends the use of board professional knowledge and experience as a moderator and board diversity as a mediator to determine the nexus between the board composition and firm performance and to avoid the use of only one single theory of corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance. The use of primary survey based methodology on the causal effect of the relationship between board composition and the performance would be a key advantage in the area of CG.

Full Text : PDF

  1. Adegbite, E. (2015). Good corporate governance in Nigeria: Antecedents, propositions, and peculiarities. International Business Review, 24(2), 319-330.
  2. Adeyemi, S. B., & Fagbemi, T. O. (2015). Audit quality, corporate governance and firm characteristics in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(5), 169-179.
  3. Adjaoud, F., D. Zeghal and S. Andaleeb (2007), the effect of a board’s quality on performance: a study of Canadian firms, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4)623-635.
  4. Akinkoye, E. Y., & Olasanmi, O. O. (2014). Corporate governance practice and level of compliance among firms in Nigeria: an Industry analysis. Journal of Business & Retail Management Research, 9(1).
  5. Appuhami, R., & Bhuyan, M. (2015). Examining the influence of corporate governance on intellectual capital efficiency: Evidence from top service firms in Australia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(4/5), 347-372.
  6. Avgouleas, E. (2008). Financial regulation, behaviour finance, and the financial credit crisis in search of a new regulatory model. Retrieved from http. papers. ssrn. com on, 24(11)
  7. Berghe, L. A. and A. Levrau (2004), Evaluating boards of directors: what constitutes a good corporate board, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 461-478.
  8. Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  9. Bhagat, S, and B. Black (2000), Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance, Law and Economics Working Paper No. 143, New York: The Centre for Law and Economics Studies at CLS.
  10. Cadbury, Sir Adrian (1992) Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of CorporateGovernance, London: Gee.
  11. CBN (2011), on capitalization of eight Nigerian banks, Abuja: Central Bank of Nigeria.
  12. Central Bank of Nigeria (2014), code of corporate governance for Banks in Nigeria post-consolidation
  13. Central Bank of Nigeria (2015). Nigerian Battle against ‘’Bad Debts” The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)’s beginning from August 1. At the 322nd Bankers’ Committee meeting in Abuja
  14. Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Ellstrand, A.E., & Johnson, J.L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269-290.
  15. Deloitte. (2011), Women in the Boardroom: A global perspective, Auckland: Deloitte Global Centre for Corporate Governance
  16. Ducassy, I., & Montandrau, S. (2015). Corporate social performance, ownership structure, and corporate governance in France. Research in International Business and Finance, 34(C), 383-396
  17. Ehikioya, B. I. (2014). Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies : evidence from Nigeria.
  18. Erhardt, N. L, J. D. Werbel and C.B. Shrader (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance, Corporate Governance: An International Review,11(2),102-111.
  19. Fama, E.F. and M.C. Jensen (1983). Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  20. Filatotchev, I. and B. K. Boyd (2009). Taking stock of corporate governance research while looking to the future, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 257-265.
  21. Finegold, D., Benson, G.S., & Hecht, D. (2007). Corporate boards and company performance: a review of research in light of recent reforms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 865-878.
  22. Global Issues (2009). Global Financial Crisis: Crisis in Context, global-financial-crisis [accessed 25th October 2015]
  23. Guest, D. E., Michie, J., Conway, N., & Sheehan, M. (2003). Human resource management and corporate performance in the UK. British journal of industrial relations, 41(2), 291-314.
  24. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results, and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1–12
  25. Harvey Pamburai, H., Chamisa, E., Abdulla, C., & Smith, C. (2015). An analysis of corporate governance and company performance: a South African perspective. South African Journal of Accounting Research, (ahead-of-print), 1-17.
  26. Hofer, C. W. (1983). ROVA: A new measure for assessing organizational performance. Advances in strategic management, 2, 43-55.
  27.  Hofstede, G. (2017).Comprehensive studies on national values, introducing the dimension concept. His most popular book, Cultures, and Organizations: Software of the Mind, has been translated into 20 different languages. Operated by item
  28.  International., Feb 3, at 6:56pm
  29. Jackling, B. and S. Johl (2009). Board structure and firm performance: evidence from India's top companies, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492-509.
  30. Jensen W.H. and M. Meckling (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
  31. Johl, S. K., Kaur, S., & Cooper, B. J. (2015). Board characteristics and firm performance: evidence from Malaysian public listed firms. Journal of Economics, Business, and Management, 3(2).
  32. Kim, Y. (2007). The proportion and social capital of outside directors and their impacts on firm value: evidence from Korea, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1168-1176.
  33. Lawal, B. (2012). Board dynamics and corporate performance: a review of the literature, and empirical Challenges. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(1), p22.
  34. Lawal, B. (2016). Re: Duplication of corporate governance codes and the Dilemma of firms with dual regulatory jurisdictions. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(3), 2–19.
  35. Lebas, M. (1995). Oui, il faut définir la performance.Revue française de comptabilité,269, 66-71.
  36. Marshall, B. J. (2015). Corporate Governance Practices : An Overview Of The Evolution Of Corporate Governance Codes In Nigeria, 3(3), 49–65.
  37. Molokwu, V. B., Barreria, J., & Urban, B. (2013), entrepreneurial orientation and corporate governance structures at the firm level in the South African oil and gas industry. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 15-pages.
  38. Mura, R. (2007), Firm performance: do non-executive directors have minds of their own? Evidence from UK panel data, Financial Management, 36(3), 81-112.
  39. NAICON Code (2009). National Insurance Commission Code of Corporate Governance for Insurance Industry. www.naicomgovg.
  40. Nasiru, A., Keat, O. Y., & Bhatti, M. A. (2015). Moderating Role of the Perception of University Support on the Relationship between Perceived Effective Entrepreneurship Education and Perceived Creativity Disposition on Entrepreneurial Intention. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 5(5), 302.
  41. NCC Code. (2014). Nigeria National Communication Commission Code of Corporate Governance
  42. Ness, R. K., P. Miesing and J. Kang (2010). Board of director composition and financial performance in a Sarbanes-Oxley world, Academy of Business & Economics Journal, 10(5), 56-74.
  43. Ngulumbu, O. M. (2013). Relationship Between Board Composition And Financial Performance Of Companies Listed At The Nairobi Securities Exchange. Unpublished, University of Nairobi.
  44. Nicholson, G. J. and G.C. Kiel (2004). A framework for diagnosing board effectiveness, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 442-460.
  45. Nordberg, D. (2011), Corporate Governance and the Board. In S. Idowu, and C. Louche, Theory and Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 39-53.
  46. Nuhu, M. and Ahmad, B. S. (2016). Investigating the issues and challenges of corporate governance in Nigerian, A Peer Reviewed International Journal of Asian Academic Research Associates, 3(12), 93-122.
  47. Nuhu, M. and Ahmad, B. S. (2016). The relationship between board size and performance of listed firms in Nigeria: mediated and moderated model, A Peer Reviewed International Journal of Asian Academic Research Associates, 3(12), 60-92.
  48. Ogbonna, N. (2016). Title: Women in Nigeria make up 49 percent of the population, but only four percent of lawmakers. Is an LSE alumna and an LSE PfAL Fellow. She currently works for the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) in New York. She blogs 
  49. at
  50. Osterloh, M. and B. S. Frey (2006), corporate governance for knowledge production: theoretical foundations and practical implications, Corporate Ownership and Control, 3(4), 163-172.
  51. PenCom (2011), Code of Corporate Governance for Licensed Pension Operators, National Pension Commission, Abuja
  52. Peng, M. W. (2014). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transition, Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 453-471
  53. Perry, T. and A. Shivdasani (2005). Do boards affect performance? Evidence from corporate restructuring, Journal of Business, 78(4), 1403-1431
  54. Rossi, M., Nerino, M., & Capasso, A. (2015). Corporate governance and financial performance of italian listed firms. The results of an empirical research. Corporate ownership & control, 628.
  55. Salama, F. M., & Zoubi, T. A. (2015). Does effective monitoring by the board of directors affect the relationship between global diversification and financial leverage? Corporate ownership & control, 644.
  56. Sanusi, L. S. (2012). Banking reform and its impact on the Nigerian economy. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, 2(2), 115-122.
  57. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2014). Code of Corporate Governance For Public Companies in Nigeria. October.
  58. Tai, L. (2015). The Impact of Corporate Governance on the Efficiency and Financial Performance of GCC National Banks. Middle East Journal of Business, 10(1).
  59. Tanna, S., F. Pasiouras and M. Nnadi (2011), the effect of board size and composition on the efficiency of UK banks, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 18(3), 441-462
  60. Weisbach, M.S. (1988) outside directors and CEO turnover, Journal of Financial Economics, 20:431-461.
  61. Yuan, G. X, and Hua, M. G. (2015). Analysis on the governance efficiency of forestry listed corporate governance. Journal of chemical and pharmaceutical research, 7(3):604-609
  62. Zahra, S. and J. Pearce (1989). Boards of directors and financial performance: a review and integrative model, Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334.