Indonesia, executive's compensation, ownership concentration, remuneration and nomination committee, State bank


          This study aims to examine the relationship between executive’s compensation and firm performance in the banking industry in Indonesia. This study also determines the impact of remuneration and nomination committee (RNC) on executive’s compensation (EC) and firm performance. The samples are listed bank in Indonesia during 2006 – 2015. The regression uses two stage least square (2SLS) with unbalanced panel data. The findings reveal that performance on pay and pay on performance are valid in Indonesia. However, the performance is only for accounting-based performance but not for market value–based performance. Furthermore, in examining the role of remuneration and nomination committee (RNC), the findings reveal that the RNC has a negative relationship to the executives’ compensation (ES). It seems the role of the RNC is preventing the overpaid of the EC. Finally, regarding the ownership structure, The state banks have the similar behavior with the main findings in this research. However, only in the state bank, the RNC has a real impact on both accounting-based performance and market value-based performance. While ownership concentration (BO) variable which is used as dependent variables in this study reveals the possibility of the agency problems or inactive block holders condition that make ineffective monitoring role of the corporation since the findings show that the more BO, the more EC, and the worse firms performance.

Full Text : PDF

  1. Abdallah, A. A.-N. and Ismail, A. K. (2016) ‘Corporate Governance Practices, Ownership Structure, and Corporate Performance in the GCC Countries’, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. Elsevier B.V., In Press (In Press), p. In Press. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2016.08.004.
  2. Aggarwal, R. K. (2007) Executive Compensation and Incentives, Handbook of Empirical Corporate Finance SET. Woodhead Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53265-7.50009-3.
  3. Al-Najjar, B. (2014) ‘corporate governance, tourism growth and firm performance: Evidence from publicly listed tourism firms in five Middle Eastern countries’, Tourism Management. Elsevier Ltd, 42, pp. 342–351. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.09.008.
  4. Alves, P., Barbosa, E. and Morais, P. (2016) ‘Research in International Business and Finance Executive pay and performance in Portuguese listed companies’, Research in International Business and Finance. Elsevier B.V., 37, pp. 184–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.11.006.
  5. Arafat, M. Y., Warokka, A., Buchdadi, A. D. and Suherman (2013) ‘Banking efficiency and performance: a test of banking characteristics in an emerging market’, J. for Global Business Advancement, 6(1), pp. 13–23. doi: 10.1504/JGBA.2013.053475.
  6. Balafas, N. and Florackis, C. (2014) ‘CEO compensation and future shareholder returns: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange’, Journal of Empirical Finance. Elsevier B.V., 27, pp. 97–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2013.10.011.
  7. Bank Indonesia (2006) Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 8/4/PBI/2006 Tentang Pelaksanaan Good Corporate Governance Bagi Bank Umum (Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 8/4 / PBI / 2006 on Implementation of Good Corporate Governance for Commercial Bank). Available at: Complete.pdf.
  8. Basu, S., Hwang, L. S., Mitsudome, T. and Weintrop, J. (2007) ‘Corporate governance, top executive compensation and firm performance in Japan’, Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 15(1), pp. 56–79. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2006.05.002.
  9. Black, B. and Kim, W. (2012) ‘The effect of board structure on firm value: A multiple identification strategies approach using Korean data’, Journal of Financial Economics. Elsevier, 104(1), pp. 203–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.001.
  10. Borisova, G., Brockman, P., Salas, J. M. and Zagorchev, A. (2012) ‘Government ownership and corporate governance: Evidence from the EU’, Journal of Banking and Finance. Elsevier B.V., 36(11), pp. 2917–2934. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.008.
  11. Brick, I. E. and Chidambaran, N. K. (2010) ‘Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value’, Journal of Corporate Finance. Elsevier B.V., 16(4), pp. 533–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.06.003.
  12. Chen, H. J. and Lin, K. T. (2016) ‘How do banks make the trade-offs among risks? The role of corporate governance’, Journal of Banking and Finance. Elsevier B.V., 72, pp. S39–S69. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.05.010.
  13. Chou, H. I., Chung, H. and Yin, X. (2013) ‘Attendance of board meetings and company performance: Evidence from Taiwan’, Journal of Banking and Finance. Elsevier B.V., 37(11), pp. 4157–4171. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.028.
  14. Chou, T. K. and Buchdadi, A. D. (2017) ‘Independent Board, Audit Committee, Risk Committee, the Meeting Attendance level and Its Impact on the Performance: A Study of Listed Banks in Indonesia’, International Journal of Business Administration, 8(3), p. 24. doi: 10.5430/ijba.v8n3p24.
  15. Chou, T. K. and Buchdadi, A. D. (2016) ‘Bank Performance and Its Underlying Factors: A Study of Rural Banks in Indonesia’, Accounting and Finance Research, 5(3), pp. 55–63. doi: 10.5430/afr.v5n3p55.
  16. Coles, J. W., McWilliams, V. B. and Sen, N. (2001) ‘An examination of the relationship of governance machanisms to performance’, Journal of Management, 27(1), pp. 23–50. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00085-4.
  17. Conyon, M. J. (1997) ‘Corporate governance and executive compensation’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(4), pp. 493–509. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01032-6.
  18. Conyon, M. J. and He, L. (2011) ‘Executive compensation and corporate governance in China’, Journal of Corporate Finance. Elsevier B.V., 17(4), pp. 1158–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.04.006.
  19. Crespi-Cladera, R. and Pascual-Fuster, B. (2015) ‘Executive directors’ pay, networks and operating performance: The influence of ownership structure’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(2), pp. 175–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.09.004.
  20. Devers, C. E., Cannella, A. A., Reilly, G. P. and Yoder, M. E. (2007) ‘Executive Compensation: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Developments’, Journal of Management, 33(6), pp. 1016–1072. doi: 10.1177/0149206307308588.
  21. Duru, A., Iyengar, R. J. and Zampelli, E. M. (2015) ‘The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence’, Journal of Business Research. Elsevier Inc., 69(10), pp. 4269–4277. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.001.
  22. Faria, P., Martins, F. V. and Brandão, E. (2014) ‘The Level of CEO Compensation for the Short and Long-term – A View on High-tech Firms’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier B.V., 110, pp. 1023–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.949.
  23. Guillet, B. D., Kucukusta, D. and Xiao, Q. (2012) ‘An examination of executive compensation in the restaurant industry’, International Journal of Hospitality Management. Elsevier Ltd, 31(1), pp. 86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.014.
  24. Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976) ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp. 305–360. doi:
  25. Klapper, L. F. and Love, I. (2004) ‘Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(5), pp. 703–728. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00046-4.
  26. Ko, H. A., Tong, Y. (Jamie), Zhang, F. (Frank) and Zheng, G. (2016) ‘Corporate governance, product market competition and managerial incentives: Evidence from four Pacific Basin countries’, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. Elsevier B.V., 40, pp. 491–502. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.10.009.
  27. Liang, Q., Xu, P. and Jiraporn, P. (2013) ‘Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance’, Journal of Banking and Finance. Elsevier B.V., 37(8), pp. 2953–2968. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.018.
  28. Mardiyati, U., Devi, M. S. and Suherman (2013) ‘Pengaruh Kinerja Perusahaan, Corporate Governance , dan Shareholder Payout Terhadap Kompensasi Eksekutif (The Impact of firms performance, Corporate governance, and shareholder payout on executives compensation)’, Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia (JRMSI), 4(2), pp. 167–183. Available at:
  29. Mashayekhi, B. and Bazaz, M. S. (2008) ‘Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Iran’, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. Elsevier Ltd, 4(2), pp. 156–172. doi: 10.1016/S1815-5669(10)70033-3.
  30. Mulili, B. M. and Wong, P. (2011) ‘Corporate Governance Practices in Developing Countries: The Case for Kenya’, International Journal of Business Administration, 2(1), p. 14. doi: 10.5430/ijba.v2n1p14.
  31. Müller, V.-O. (2014) ‘The Impact of Board Composition on the Financial Performance of FTSE100 Constituents’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier B.V., 109, pp. 969–975. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.573.
  32. Munisi, G., Hermes, N. and Randoy, T. (2014) ‘Corporate boards and ownership structure: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa’, International Business Review. Elsevier Ltd, 23(4), pp. 785–796. doi:
  33.  10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.12.001.
  34. Munisi, G. and Randoy, T. (2013) ‘Corporate Governance and Company Performance across Sub-Saharan African Countries’, Journal of Economics and Business. Elsevier Inc., 70, pp. 92–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.08.003.
  35. Murray, M. P. (2006) Econometrics A Modern Introduction (chapter 16 Lecture 24), Pearson Addison-Wesley. Available at: (Accessed: 9 June 2017).
  36. Nguyen, T., Locke, S. and Reddy, K. (2015) ‘Ownership concentration and corporate performance from a dynamic perspective: Does national governance quality matter?’, International Review of Financial Analysis. Elsevier Inc., 41, pp. 148–161. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2015.06.005.
  37. Omran, M. (2009) ‘Post-privatization corporate governance and firm performance: The role of private ownership concentration, identity and board composition’, Journal of Comparative Economics. Association for Comparative Economic Studies, 37(4), pp. 658–673. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2009.02.002.
  38. Salim, R., Arjomandi, A. and Seufert, J. H. (2016) ‘Does corporate governance affect Australian banks’ performance?’, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. Elsevier B.V., 43, pp. 113–125. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2016.04.006.
  39. Samaha, K., Dahawy, K., Hussainey, K. and Stapleton, P. (2012) ‘The extent of corporate governance disclosure and its determinants in a developing market: The case of Egypt’, Advances in Accounting. Elsevier Ltd, 28(1), pp. 168–178. doi: 10.1016/j.adiac.2011.12.001.
  40. Sarpal, S. (2015) ‘Determinants of Corporate Board Independence: Empirical Evidence from India’, Management and Labour Studies, 40(1–2), pp. 52–74. doi: 10.1177/0258042X15601533.
  41. Schultz, E. L., Tan, D. T. and Walsh, K. D. (2010) ‘Endogeneity and the corporate governance - performance relation’, Australian Journal of Management, 35(2), pp. 145–163. doi: 
  42. 10.1177/0312896210370079.
  43. Slomka-Golebiowska, A. and Urbanek, P. (2016) ‘Corporate boards, large blockholders and executive compensation in banks: Evidence from Poland’, Emerging Markets Review, 28, pp. 203–220. doi: 
  44. 10.1016/j.ememar.2016.08.001.
  45. Subekti, I. and Sumargo, D. K. (2015) ‘Family Management, Executive Compensation and Financial Performance of Indonesian Listed Companies’, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, pp. 578–584. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.076.
  46. Suherman, Rahmawati, W. and Buchdadi, A. D. (2011) Firm performance, corporate governance, and executive compensation in financial firms: Evidence from Indonesia. Available at:
  48. Tan, Y. (2014) ‘Corporate governance in the banking sector’, in Performance, Risk and Competition in the Chinese Banking Industry. Elsevier, pp. 39–64. doi: 10.1533/9781780634463.39.
  49. Tao, N. B. and Hutchinson, M. (2013) ‘Corporate governance and risk management: The role of risk management and compensation committees’, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. Elsevier Ltd, 9(1), pp. 83–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jcae.2013.03.003.
  50. Zhu, J., Ye, K., Tucker, J. W. and Chan, K. (Johnny) C. (2016) ‘Board hierarchy, independent directors, and firm value: Evidence from China’, Journal of Corporate Finance. Elsevier B.V., 41, pp. 262–279. doi:
  51.  10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.09.009