Value Chain, Industry 4.0, autonomous production
Industry 4.0 is originated in Germany in 2011, it is focused on optimize value chain through autonomous manufacturing and through technological systems; it’s related with automotive sector as a product of international highly competitive. That is how the fourth industrial revolution started. The sector is very dynamic in Asia-Pacific, Mexico and United States. The goal of this investigation is to determinate three groups with respect to Industry 4.0, which allows them to identify new technology-based business strategies. The hypothesis shows that proposed methodology is useful to evaluate adopted strategies in the business to introduce the industry 4.0.
A transverse quantitative study was realized, using multivariate statistic and a population of 16 automobiles distributors located in three adjacent cities. An instrument was designed with six variables: Process, Product, Persons, Technology, Business and Social Responsibility. With 30 items; it was validated by Cronbach's alpha and it was used SPSS V25.
Three groups were determined with similarity shown in four indicator variables in the technology stage in industry 4.0. Groups were determined through ANOVA test. The most significant variables were analyzed by groups. A characterization of the variables was realized for their interpretation.
“Process” variable got the highest value among the three groups; the perception about productive process, services that they offer, and continuous improvement are positively identified at interior of the business. Process, Persons and Social Responsibility are the highest variables of the group three.
Full Text : PDF
- Basurto, R. (2013). Structure and recomposition of the global automotive industry. Journal of economic literature, 10(30), 75-90.
- Baena, F., Guarin, A., Mora, J., Sauza, J. & Retat, S. (2017). Learning Factory: The path to Industry 4.0. 7th Conference on Learning Factories. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.022
- Blanco, M., González, K. & Rodríguez, J. (2017). Proposal of UAM architecture in industry 4.0 in the supply chain from the perspective of industrial engineering. Solidaria, 13(23), 77-90.
- Blanco, R., Fontrodona, J. & Poveda, C. (2017). Industry 4.0: the state of the matter [La industria 4.0: el estado de la cuestión). Economía Industrial, 403, 151-164.
- Bearzotti, L. (2017). Industry 4.0 and supply chain management: the challenge of the new industrial revolution. Gaceta Sansana, 3(8), 1-7.
- Cano, J. & Baena, J. (2015). Trends in the use of information and communication technologies for international negotiation [Tendencias en el uso de las tecnologías de información y comunicación para la negociación internacional). Estudios gerenciales, 31, 335-346.
- Carbajal, J. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution or Industry 4.0 and its Impact on Higher Education in Engineering in Latin America and the Caribbean. 15th LACCEI. 19-21 July 2017, Boca Raton Fl, United States.
- Catalan, C., Serna, F. & Blesa, A. (2015). Industry 4.0 in the degree of Electronic and Automatic Engineering. UPCommons, 327-332.
- Chen, J. (2012). Advances in Hospitality and Leisure. Bingle: Emerald Group Publishing, Vol. 8.
- Cocca, P., Marciano, F., Rossi, D. & Alberti, M. (2018). Business Software Offer for Industry 4.0: the SAP case. IFAC.1200-1205.
- Cornelis, J. & Strandhagen, J. (2017). An Industry 4.0 research agenda for sustainable business models, Procedia CIRP, 63, 721–726.
- Da, L., Xu, E. & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends, International Journal of Production Research. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
- Dassisti, M., Giovannini, Pasquale, M., Chimienti, M. & Panetto H. (2018). An approach to support Industry 4.0 adoption in SMEs using a core-metamodel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.11.001.
- Esguerra, G. & Contreras, F. (2016). Electronic leadership, an unavoidable challenge for today's organizations [Liderazgo electrónico, un reto ineludible para las organizaciones de hoy). Estudios gerenciales, 32, 262-268.
- Ford. (2019). Ford 4.0: the New Industrial Revolution. Ford Website: https://www.ford.mx/blog/legado/nueva-revolucion-industrial-201809/
- Germán, A., Santos L. & Fabián, N. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004
- González, G. & Rodríguez, F. (2017). Automation of an industrial power plant through distributed. RISTI, 27(6).
- Joyanes, L. (2017). Cybersecurity: public-private collaboration in the era of the fourth industrial revolution Industry 4.0 [Ciberseguridad: la colaboración público-privada en la era de la cuarta revolución industrial Industria 4.0). Cuaderno de estrategía, 185, 16-64.
- Hair, J., Hult, G. & Ringle, C. (2016). Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2 ed. Nueva York: SAGE Publications.
- Huerta, A. (2014). The Mexican manufacturing industry seen from within the context of industrialization of China and India [La industria manufacturera mexicana vista desde en el contexto de industrialización de China e India). Economía Informa, 38, 41-69.
- Kamp, B. (2016). Servitization as a strategy for the competitive evolution of the industry. [on line]. Available at: https://www.orkestra.deusto.es/es/investigacion/publicaciones/articulos-cientificos/1083-servitizacion-estrategia-evolucion-competitiva-industria
- Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1-10.
- López, M., Pereira, A. & Alves, A. (2017). Smart products development approaches for Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing. 13, 1215-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.035
- López, A, (2011). The control of industrial processes and their influence on maintenance [El control de procesos industriales y su influencia en el mantenimiento). Ingeniería Industrial. [on line]. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=337428495003
- Méndez, A. (2017). Talent migration as a development strategy: Mexico-Japan [Migración de talentos como estrategia de desarrollo: México-Japón). Revista problemas de desarrollo, 190(48), 137-164.
- Micheli, J. & Oliver, R. (2017). Software companies in Mexico and their links to local development [Empresas de software en México y sus vínculos con el desarrollo local). Revista problemas de desarrollo, 190(48), 37-59.
- Müller, J. & Voigt, K. (2018). The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Supply Chains in Engineer-to-Order Industries – An Exploratory Case Study. IFAC, 122–127.
- Munive, M. (2014). Detonators of technological modernization in the graphic industry of Mexico: a methodology and a case of success [Detonadores de la modernización tecnológica en la industria gráfica de México: una metodología y un caso de éxito), 16(3), 317-334.
- Ortega, C. (2014). Inclusion of ICTs in the Colombian company. Suma de negocios. 5 (10), 29-33.
- Ortíz, S. (2017). Mexico's commercial relationship with the United States and China in the 21st century: effects on the local integration of the Mexican productive apparatus. Economía Informa. 407. 40-52.
- Pérez, L., Saucedo., Salais, T. & Marmolejo, J. (2016). Characterization of a business model within the framework of Industry 4.0. Congreso Internacional de Logística y Cadena de Suministro. [en línea]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320336233_Caracterizacion_de_modelo_de_negocio_en_el_marco_de_industria_40
- Robayo, P. (2016). Innovation as a process and its management in the organization: an application for the Colombian graphic sector. Suma de negocios. 7,125-140.
- Rodríguez, M., Balestrini, S., Balestrini, S., Romero, M. y Rodríguez, C. (2002). Analysis of the industrial strategic sector [Análisis del sector estratégico industrial). Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 7(1), 135-156.
- Rodríguez, J., Sierra, J., Villazón, M. Cabrera, A., Sosa, V. & Cortizo, J. (2018). Design engineering in surgery. How to design, market surgical devices made with 3D printing? Cirugía Española.
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.12.007
- Román, R. (2010). Success factors in the implementation of information and communication technologies in health systems [Factores de éxito en la implementación de tecnologías de información y comunicación en los sistemas de salud). Medicina Clínica, 134(1), 39-44.
- Schoeder, W. (2016). The German Industry 4.0 strategy: Rhenish capitalism in the era of digitalization. [on line]. Available at: http://fes-madrid.org/media/2017_FESpublicaciones/FES_Industria_4.0.pdf
- Setó, D. & Angla, J. (2011). Nature of the Company's Social Responsibility (CSR) relationship and the financial result. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20(4), 161-176.
- Santos, K., Loures, E., Piechnicki, F. & Canciglieri, O. (2017). Opportunities Assessment of Product Development Process in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1358-1365.
- Santos, L., Brittes, G., Fabián, N. & Germán, A. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383-394.
- SIEMENS. (2019). The future of the industry: Industrial Digitalization. 2019. Sitio web:
- https://w5.siemens.com/spain/web/es/el-futuro-de-la-industria/pages/el_futuro_de_la_industria.aspx
- Sueptraetakun, W. (2018). Determinants of collaboration and innovation towards organization performance within Thailand's automotive parts industry. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), Vol. 13 Issue 2.